Money or Reform? C’mon, it’s got to be both!

UNCF Leaders' Luncheon on Education panelists
Panelists at the UNCF Leaders' Luncheon on Education included State Education Commissioner Brenda Cassellius, Minneapolis Mayor RT Rybak, State Reepresentative Pat Garofalo, State Representative Carlos Mariani Rosa, UNCF President and CEO Michael Lomax

The United Negro College Fund held its annual Leaders' Luncheon on Education this week in Minneapolis, featuring a discussion panel with two state legislators (a Democrat and a Republican), Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak and State Education Commissioner Brenda Casselius. Each respondent was asked to respond to the question, “What has to happen to improve education in Minnesota?”

I found this discussion to be very rich but also extremely frustrating. For the life of me, I don’t know why we continue to allow this conversation to be framed simply as “more money” (the Democratic response) vs. “more reform” (the Republican response). 

Of course, it is both: money and reform. We need adequate funding to educate students for the 21st century, and we also need reforms that challenge a status quo system that often prioritizes the needs of adults at the expense of children.

Can it be that hard to agree that education is the single most important investment we can make in the future of our state and therefore deserves to be well-funded? Is it that difficult to see that we have an ossified system with certain structural barriers that stand in the way of increasing student achievement?

If we have the will—and if we stop playing politics with education—we can build a bi-partisan consensus for both more money and deeper reform. This would be the responsible thing to do.

Mayor Rybak came the closest to offering a more nuanced response to what can be done by calling on everyone to be more accountable: teachers, principals, legislators, nonprofits, the mayor’s office, the county, faith communities, parents and students, everyone.

We need to stop finger pointing and point the finger back at ourselves. We need to ask if we are doing everything we can. And we need to hold decision-makers accountable for moving forward an education agenda that is common-sense, child-centered and bold in its willingness to do what is necessary.

Comments

Reform and $

Thanks for posting this, Pam. Yes, thoughtful use of money and reforms can have a powerful positive impact.

However, some reforms need not cost more money. For example, some of us are encouraging the legislature to allow colleges and universities to tell families and students that they can save $ by participating in Post Secondary Options legislation. The PSEO law currently prohibits this. We're also suggesting that 9th and 10th graders be allowed to take 1 PSEO course. If they earn at least a "C" they would be allowed to continue. We're making the same suggestion for students who are 11th and 12th graders who do not meet MnSCU's standards of top 1/3 of their class for the junior year, and top 1/2 of their senior year (that is, let them take one PSEO class and if they earn a C they can continue).

So yes, some efforts to improve public schools do involve spending more money and well as changing existing arrangements. Some do not.

Joe Nathan

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.